Radeon RX 6900 XT vs Pro 5500M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Pro 5500M
2019
8 GB GDDR6
17.61

RX 6900 XT outperforms Pro 5500M by 294% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking28818
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money4.6218.68
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA (2019−2020)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 14Navi 21
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 November 2019 (4 years old)8 December 2020 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999
Current price$1950 $957 (1x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6900 XT has 304% better value for money than Pro 5500M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15365120
Core clock speedno data1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate139.2720.0

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 5500M and Radeon RX 6900 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMIno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5500M 17.61
RX 6900 XT 69.34
+294%

RX 6900 XT outperforms Pro 5500M by 294% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro 5500M 6819
RX 6900 XT 26856
+294%

RX 6900 XT outperforms Pro 5500M by 294% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro 5500M 14725
RX 6900 XT 59119
+301%

RX 6900 XT outperforms Pro 5500M by 301% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pro 5500M 10399
RX 6900 XT 50587
+386%

RX 6900 XT outperforms Pro 5500M by 386% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
−239%
193
+239%
1440p49
−173%
134
+173%
4K32
−159%
83
+159%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−386%
130−140
+386%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−225%
117
+225%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−463%
169
+463%
Battlefield 5 76
−157%
195
+157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−284%
170−180
+284%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−386%
130−140
+386%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−241%
150−160
+241%
Far Cry New Dawn 67
−88.1%
126
+88.1%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−364%
283
+364%
Hitman 3 81
−249%
283
+249%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−454%
205
+454%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55
−256%
196
+256%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58
−283%
222
+283%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−459%
190
+459%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−194%
106
+194%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−373%
142
+373%
Battlefield 5 62
−216%
196
+216%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 17
−918%
170−180
+918%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−386%
130−140
+386%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−241%
150−160
+241%
Far Cry New Dawn 64
−92.2%
123
+92.2%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−357%
279
+357%
Hitman 3 64
−331%
276
+331%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−370%
174
+370%
Metro Exodus 37
−343%
164
+343%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
−343%
124
+343%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50
−314%
207
+314%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
−375%
323
+375%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−400%
170
+400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−172%
98
+172%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−357%
137
+357%
Battlefield 5 59
−234%
197
+234%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−386%
130−140
+386%
Far Cry 5 55
−185%
150−160
+185%
Far Cry New Dawn 57
−107%
118
+107%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−307%
248
+307%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
−321%
164
+321%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−256%
121
+256%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−385%
120−130
+385%
Hitman 3 27−30
−661%
213
+661%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−467%
136
+467%
Metro Exodus 22
−364%
102
+364%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−531%
82
+531%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
−430%
159
+430%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−421%
99
+421%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−627%
109
+627%
Battlefield 5 47
−317%
196
+317%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−640%
70−75
+640%
Far Cry 5 40
−235%
130−140
+235%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
−185%
117
+185%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−560%
231
+560%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−574%
120−130
+574%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−658%
91
+658%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−500%
75−80
+500%
Hitman 3 16−18
−700%
128
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−217%
38
+217%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−570%
67
+570%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−450%
55
+450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
−554%
85
+554%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−618%
122
+618%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−518%
68
+518%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−633%
66
+633%
Battlefield 5 14
−857%
134
+857%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Far Cry 5 20
−310%
80−85
+310%
Far Cry New Dawn 21
−381%
101
+381%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−548%
162
+548%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−671%
54
+671%

This is how Pro 5500M and RX 6900 XT compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RX 6900 XT is 239% faster than Pro 5500M

1440p resolution:

  • RX 6900 XT is 173% faster than Pro 5500M

4K resolution:

  • RX 6900 XT is 159% faster than Pro 5500M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6900 XT is 1067% faster than the Pro 5500M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6900 XT surpassed Pro 5500M in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 17.61 69.34
Recency 13 November 2019 8 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 300 Watt

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5500M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5500M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 242 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3369 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.