Radeon RX 7800 XT vs PRO WX 2100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 2100 with Radeon RX 7800 XT, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 2100
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
4.75

RX 7800 XT outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a whopping 1220% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking64231
Place by popularitynot in top-10093
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.6570.96
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLexaNavi 32
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date4 June 2017 (7 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7800 XT has 1426% better value for money than PRO WX 2100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5123840
Core clock speed925 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz2430 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt263 Watt
Texture fill rate39.01583.2
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs32240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO WX 2100 4.75
RX 7800 XT 62.71
+1220%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 2100 1834
RX 7800 XT 24187
+1219%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−1250%
216
+1250%
1440p9−10
−1300%
126
+1300%
4K5−6
−1380%
74
+1380%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−3125%
258
+3125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−1269%
178
+1269%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−4340%
222
+4340%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−1558%
190−200
+1558%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−1040%
110−120
+1040%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−2313%
193
+2313%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1030%
110−120
+1030%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−1062%
150−160
+1062%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−667%
230−240
+667%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1140%
120−130
+1140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−652%
230−240
+652%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−1309%
150−160
+1309%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−808%
110−120
+808%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1406%
250−260
+1406%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−233%
150−160
+233%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−1908%
261
+1908%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−3520%
181
+3520%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−1558%
190−200
+1558%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−1040%
110−120
+1040%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1913%
161
+1913%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1030%
110−120
+1030%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−1062%
150−160
+1062%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−667%
230−240
+667%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1140%
120−130
+1140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−652%
230−240
+652%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−1309%
150−160
+1309%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−808%
110−120
+808%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−2241%
398
+2241%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−676%
130−140
+676%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−233%
150−160
+233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−900%
130
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−3060%
158
+3060%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−1040%
110−120
+1040%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1750%
148
+1750%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1030%
110−120
+1030%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−640%
222
+640%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1140%
120−130
+1140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−784%
274
+784%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1900%
340
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1076%
200
+1076%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−222%
145
+222%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−808%
110−120
+808%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1300%
95−100
+1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2875%
119
+2875%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1750%
70−75
+1750%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4750%
97
+4750%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1360%
70−75
+1360%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−2911%
270−280
+2911%
Hitman 3 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−1873%
217
+1873%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−7300%
148
+7300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−3575%
147
+3575%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−683%
230−240
+683%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−1067%
100−110
+1067%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2333%
70−75
+2333%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1933%
60−65
+1933%
Hitman 3 1−2
−5300%
50−55
+5300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−4360%
220−230
+4360%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−9300%
90−95
+9300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−11700%
118
+11700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2867%
89
+2867%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−3500%
72
+3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 44
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2050%
40−45
+2050%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4000%
164
+4000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−6600%
67
+6600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1180%
60−65
+1180%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 124
+0%
124
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 243
+0%
243
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130
+0%
130
+0%

This is how PRO WX 2100 and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 1250% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 1300% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 1380% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 11700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is ahead in 68 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.75 62.71
Recency 4 June 2017 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 263 Watt

PRO WX 2100 has 651.4% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 1220.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 37 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2430 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.