GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7600

Place in performance ranking	62	147
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	74.98	25.84
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Navi 33	Turing TU116
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	3 August 2023 (less than a year ago)	22 February 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	$279
Current price	$579 (1x MSRP)	$284 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7600 has 190% better value for money than GTX 1660 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1536
Core clock speed	no data	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	2440 MHz	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	312.3	169.9

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	229 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	18 GB/s	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort 2.1	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.7	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7600 46.76
+39.7%

GTX 1660 Ti 33.47

Radeon PRO W7600 outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti by 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

PRO W7600 18057
+39.7%

GTX 1660 Ti 12926

Radeon PRO W7600 outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti by 40% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	140−150 +34.6%	104 −34.6%
1440p	75−80 +31.6%	57 −31.6%
4K	50−55 +31.6%	38 −31.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

100−105

+28.2%

78
−28.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	120−130 +39.5%	86 −39.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 +35.1%	74 −35.1%
Battlefield 5	180−190 +38.5%	130 −38.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 +36.8%	95 −36.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 +33.8%	71 −33.8%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +34.6%	104 −34.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +33.9%	112 −33.9%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +37.4%	131 −37.4%
Hitman 3	95−100 +37.7%	65−70 −37.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	250−260 +38.9%	180 −38.9%
Metro Exodus	180−190 +34.3%	134 −34.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	160−170 +34.5%	119 −34.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 +34.6%	156 −34.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +37.9%	85−90 −37.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−105 +38.9%	72 −38.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75−80 +36.4%	55 −36.4%
Battlefield 5	160−170 +32.2%	121 −32.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +29.4%	85 −29.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +31.6%	57 −31.6%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +34.1%	82 −34.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +39.2%	79 −39.2%
Forza Horizon 4	300−310 +37.6%	218 −37.6%
Hitman 3	95−100 +37.7%	65−70 −37.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 +34.3%	130−140 −34.3%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +35.9%	103 −35.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	140−150 +35.9%	103 −35.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 +33.9%	127 −33.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	160−170 +37.9%	116 −37.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +37.9%	85−90 −37.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +32.1%	53 −32.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +30%	50 −30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 +35.7%	70 −35.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +30.4%	46 −30.4%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +39.3%	61 −39.3%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +34%	97 −34%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +37.3%	102 −37.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150−160 +36.4%	110 −36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 +37.1%	62 −37.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +37.9%	85−90 −37.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

130−140

+34%

97
−34%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−105 +33.3%	75 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +34.1%	82 −34.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +34.1%	41 −34.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +38.9%	36 −38.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +36.4%	55 −36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +29.6%	27 −29.6%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +34.3%	67 −34.3%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 +29.9%	77 −29.9%
Hitman 3	55−60 +31%	40−45 −31%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 +33.3%	75 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +38.5%	65 −38.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 +28.2%	78 −28.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +30.4%	45−50 −30.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +25%	27−30 −25%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95
+38.5%

−38.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +38.9%	36 −38.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +37.9%	29 −37.9%
Hitman 3	35−40 +29.6%	27−30 −29.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +34.1%	40−45 −34.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +34.6%	26 −34.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +39.5%	43 −39.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +20%	25 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +26.3%	19 −26.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +20%	25 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +27.3%	11 −27.3%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +35%	20 −35%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +37.3%	51 −37.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +31%	42 −31%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +28.6%	35 −28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
+36.4%

−36.4%

This is how PRO W7600 and GTX 1660 Ti compete in popular games:

PRO W7600 is 35% faster in 1080p
PRO W7600 is 32% faster in 1440p
PRO W7600 is 32% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	46.76	33.47
Recency	3 August 2023	22 February 2019
Cost	$599	$279
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	120 Watt