GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon PRO W7600

Place in the ranking	126	204
Place by popularity	not in top-100	56
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	69.64	no data
Power efficiency	19.64	18.23
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 33	TU116
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	3 August 2023 (1 year ago)	22 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1280
Core clock speed	no data	1530 MHz
Boost clock speed	2440 MHz	1725 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	312.3	138.0
Floating-point processing power	no data	4.416 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	128	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	229 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	18 GB/s	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort 2.1	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	no data	+
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.7	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7600 36.87
+40%

GTX 1650 SUPER 26.33

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7600 14226
+40%

GTX 1650 SUPER 10161

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	95−100 +33.8%	71 −33.8%
1440p	50−55 +35.1%	37 −35.1%
4K	30−35 +36.4%	22 −36.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	6.31	no data
1440p	11.98	no data
4K	19.97	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	53 +0%	53 +0%
Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	50 +0%	50 +0%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Hitman 3	62 +0%	62 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Metro Exodus	69 +0%	69 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	84 +0%	84 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	180 +0%	180 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	26 +0%	26 +0%
Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +0%	40 +0%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Hitman 3	59 +0%	59 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Metro Exodus	82 +0%	82 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	101 +0%	101 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	180 +0%	180 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	15 +0%	15 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 +0%	34 +0%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Hitman 3	53 +0%	53 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	83 +0%	83 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	83 +0%	83 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50 +0%	50 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21 +0%	21 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	13 +0%	13 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	20 +0%	20 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Hitman 3	34 +0%	34 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60 +0%	60 +0%
Metro Exodus	55 +0%	55 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60 +0%	60 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	164 +0%	164 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Hitman 3	34 +0%	34 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Metro Exodus	32 +0%	32 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	32 +0%	32 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5 +0%	5 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3 +0%	3 +0%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30 +0%	30 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8 +0%	8 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

This is how PRO W7600 and GTX 1650 SUPER compete in popular games:

PRO W7600 is 34% faster in 1080p
PRO W7600 is 35% faster in 1440p
PRO W7600 is 36% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	36.87	26.33
Recency	3 August 2023	22 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	100 Watt

PRO W7600 has a 40% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1650 SUPER, on the other hand, has 30% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.