GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs Radeon PRO W7500

Place in the ranking	121	345
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	100.00	no data
Power efficiency	37.11	14.19
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Navi 33	GP107
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	3 August 2023 (1 year ago)	3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$429	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	768
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	1493 MHz
Boost clock speed	1700 MHz	1620 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	97 °C
Texture fill rate	190.4	77.76
Floating-point processing power	12.19 TFLOPS	2.488 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	112	48
Ray Tracing Cores	28	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	216 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1344 MHz	7 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	172.0 GB/s	112 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort 2.1	No outputs
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Ansel

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.7	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.2.131
CUDA	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	130−140 +132%	56 −132%
1440p	60−65 +140%	25 −140%
4K	40−45 +135%	17 −135%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.30	no data
1440p	7.15	no data
4K	10.73	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	43 +0%	43 +0%
Battlefield 5	59 +0%	59 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	47 +0%	47 +0%
Far Cry 5	47 +0%	47 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	46 +0%	46 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	62 +0%	62 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	33 +0%	33 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	39 +0%	39 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37 +0%	37 +0%
Battlefield 5	49 +0%	49 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	33 +0%	33 +0%
Far Cry 5	44 +0%	44 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	42 +0%	42 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	57 +0%	57 +0%
Metro Exodus	19 +0%	19 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	33 +0%	33 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	47 +0%	47 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	23 +0%	23 +0%
Battlefield 5	42 +0%	42 +0%
Far Cry 5	40 +0%	40 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 +0%	38 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	43 +0%	43 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 +0%	26 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21 +0%	21 +0%
Metro Exodus	12 +0%	12 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17 +0%	17 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Battlefield 5	29 +0%	29 +0%
Far Cry 5	26 +0%	26 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	27 +0%	27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4 +0%	4 +0%
Metro Exodus	7 +0%	7 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8 +0%	8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 +0%	17 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	12 +0%	12 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	13 +0%	13 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

This is how PRO W7500 and GTX 1050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

PRO W7500 is 132% faster in 1080p
PRO W7500 is 140% faster in 1440p
PRO W7500 is 135% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 43 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	37.58	15.40
Recency	3 August 2023	3 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	75 Watt

PRO W7500 has a 144% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.