GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W7500

Place in the ranking	141	422
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	100.00	no data
Power efficiency	35.02	10.64
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Navi 33	GP107B
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	3 August 2023 (1 year ago)	3 January 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$429	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	640
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	1354 MHz
Boost clock speed	1700 MHz	1493 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	97 °C
Texture fill rate	190.4	59.72
Floating-point processing power	12.19 TFLOPS	1.911 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	16
TMUs	112	40
Ray Tracing Cores	28	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	no data	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	216 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4000 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1344 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	172.0 GB/s	112 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort 2.1	DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDCP	-	2.2
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	-	+
GPU Boost	no data	3.0
Ansel	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.7	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.2.131
CUDA	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	220−230 +201%	73 −201%
Full HD	140−150 +204%	46 −204%
1440p	70−75 +192%	24 −192%
4K	45−50 +200%	15 −200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.06	no data
1440p	6.13	no data
4K	9.53	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	51 +0%	51 +0%
Far Cry 5	39 +0%	39 +0%
Fortnite	132 +0%	132 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	55 +0%	55 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	46 +0%	46 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 +0%	27 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	44 +0%	44 +0%
Dota 2	126 +0%	126 +0%
Far Cry 5	36 +0%	36 +0%
Fortnite	51 +0%	51 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	52 +0%	52 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	42 +0%	42 +0%
Metro Exodus	19 +0%	19 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	41 +0%	41 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14 +0%	14 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 +0%	39 +0%
World of Tanks	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	37 +0%	37 +0%
Dota 2	115 +0%	115 +0%
Far Cry 5	33 +0%	33 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	37 +0%	37 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	29 +0%	29 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 +0%	22 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Metro Exodus	11 +0%	11 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	26 +0%	26 +0%
Far Cry 5	21 +0%	21 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	26 +0%	26 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	7 +0%	7 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	13 +0%	13 +0%
Dota 2	34 +0%	34 +0%
Far Cry 5	11 +0%	11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	15 +0%	15 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12 +0%	12 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

+0%

This is how PRO W7500 and GTX 1050 Mobile compete in popular games:

PRO W7500 is 201% faster in 900p
PRO W7500 is 204% faster in 1080p
PRO W7500 is 192% faster in 1440p
PRO W7500 is 200% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 41 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	34.22	11.14
Recency	3 August 2023	3 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4000 MB
Chip lithography	6 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	75 Watt

PRO W7500 has a 207.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 104.8% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.