GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Radeon HD 8650M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8650M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8650M
2013
2 GB GDDR5
2.04

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms HD 8650M by a whopping 890% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking874268
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Power efficiencyno data28.06
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU116
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2013 (11 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed650 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors900 Million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data95.04
Floating-point processing powerno data3.041 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8650M 2.04
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.20
+890%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 8650M 1050
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930
+846%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8650M 7500
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163
+769%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−1060%
58
+1060%
1440p4−5
−975%
43
+975%
4K2−3
−1250%
27
+1250%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1375%
59
+1375%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−771%
61
+771%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−6500%
65−70
+6500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−960%
53
+960%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1050%
46
+1050%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2200%
69
+2200%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1580%
84
+1580%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1671%
120−130
+1671%
Hitman 3 6−7
−750%
51
+750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−965%
181
+965%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1000%
44
+1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−644%
65−70
+644%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−474%
201
+474%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−6500%
65−70
+6500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−840%
47
+840%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−800%
36
+800%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1833%
58
+1833%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1080%
59
+1080%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1671%
120−130
+1671%
Hitman 3 6−7
−733%
50
+733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−959%
180
+959%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−875%
39
+875%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−733%
75
+733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−423%
183
+423%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−286%
27
+286%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−520%
31
+520%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−750%
34
+750%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1200%
39
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1671%
120−130
+1671%
Hitman 3 6−7
−617%
43
+617%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−276%
64
+276%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−600%
63
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−225%
39
+225%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+59.1%
22
−59.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−925%
41
+925%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1200%
35−40
+1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1167%
38
+1167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16
+1500%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1200%
26
+1200%
Hitman 3 7−8
−300%
28
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−583%
40−45
+583%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−1100%
120
+1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−560%
30−35
+560%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1900%
20
+1900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 10−12
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1100%
12
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 9−10

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
+0%
49
+0%
Metro Exodus 91
+0%
91
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
+0%
32
+0%
Metro Exodus 79
+0%
79
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
+0%
15
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hitman 3 16
+0%
16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 42
+0%
42
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how HD 8650M and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 1060% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 975% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 1250% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 8650M is 59% faster.
  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 6500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 8650M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 52 tests (74%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.04 20.20
Recency 7 January 2013 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has a 890.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8650M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650M
Radeon HD 8650M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 11 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1608 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.