UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Radeon HD 8690M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8690M and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8690M
2012
1 GB GDDR5
2.55

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms HD 8690M by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking790619
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.14no data
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameSunTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date16 November 2012 (11 years ago)15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$596 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38448
Core clock speed775 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors690 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data28 Watt
Texture fill rate16.50no data
Floating-point performance528.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 8690M and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed4500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8690M 2.55
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 4.55
+78.4%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms Radeon HD 8690M by 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 8690M 1600
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 3510
+119%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms Radeon HD 8690M by 119% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 8690M 1210
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 2321
+91.8%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms Radeon HD 8690M by 92% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 8690M 7930
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 15992
+102%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms Radeon HD 8690M by 102% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
+17.6%
17
−17.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Battlefield 5 3−4 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
Hitman 3 5−6 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Battlefield 5 3−4 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
Hitman 3 5−6 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
Hitman 3 8−9 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4 no data
Metro Exodus 5−6 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12
−75%
21−24
+75%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

This is how HD 8690M and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compete in popular games:

  • HD 8690M is 18% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.55 4.55
Recency 16 November 2012 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8690M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8690M
Radeon HD 8690M
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 94 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8690M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 427 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.