T400 vs Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics

Place in performance ranking	772	440
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	16.46
Architecture	no data	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	no data	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 August 2013 (10 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price	$90	$83

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	384
Core clock speed	720 / 775 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	34.20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics and T400 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 - 2000 MHz	10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	no data	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

3x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.6
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	no data	1.2
CUDA	no data	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p

−245%

100−110
+245%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

1−2

−400%

5−6
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Hitman 3	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Hitman 3	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−500%

6−7
+500%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	3−4

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Hitman 3	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	2−3
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	1−2

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−500%

6−7
+500%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	1−2
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	2−3
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	3−4

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	2−3
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	0−1	1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	3−4
Metro Exodus	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1