Arc Pro A30M vs Radeon HD 8180

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8180 with Arc Pro A30M, including specs and performance data.

HD 8180
2013
4 Watt
0.36

Arc Pro A30M outperforms HD 8180 by a whopping 4122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1279348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.19
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameKalindiDG2-128
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release dateNovember 2013 (11 years ago)8 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281024
Core clock speed225 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.800128.0
Floating-point processing power0.0576 TFLOPS4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8180 0.36
Arc Pro A30M 15.20
+4122%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8180 138
Arc Pro A30M 5862
+4148%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−4007%
1150−1200
+4007%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−3789%
350−400
+3789%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−4007%
1150−1200
+4007%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−3789%
350−400
+3789%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−4007%
1150−1200
+4007%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−4067%
250−260
+4067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 15.20
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 50 Watt

HD 8180 has 1150% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A30M, on the other hand, has a 4122.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro A30M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8180 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8180 is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro A30M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8180
Radeon HD 8180
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 43 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8180 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.