Arc Pro A30M vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire with Arc Pro A30M, including specs and performance data.

HD 7970M Crossfire
2012
200 Watt
16.01
+5.4%

HD 7970M Crossfire outperforms Arc Pro A30M by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking335348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.5621.12
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameWimbledon XTDG2-128
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 May 2012 (12 years ago)8 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601024
Core clock speed850 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data128.0
Floating-point processing powerno data4.096 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p132
+10%
120−130
−10%
Full HD101
+6.3%
95−100
−6.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+8.4%
95−100
−8.4%
Hitman 3 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+8%
75−80
−8%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+8%
75−80
−8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+8.4%
95−100
−8.4%
Hitman 3 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+8%
75−80
−8%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+8%
75−80
−8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+8.4%
95−100
−8.4%
Hitman 3 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+8%
75−80
−8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+8%
75−80
−8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+7.5%
80−85
−7.5%
Hitman 3 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+8.9%
90−95
−8.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Hitman 3 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+8%
75−80
−8%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

This is how HD 7970M Crossfire and Arc Pro A30M compete in popular games:

  • HD 7970M Crossfire is 10% faster in 900p
  • HD 7970M Crossfire is 6% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.01 15.19
Recency 1 May 2012 8 August 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 50 Watt

HD 7970M Crossfire has a 5.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Pro A30M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire and Arc Pro A30M.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro A30M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 19 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.