GeForce GT 220 vs Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

Place in the ranking	877	1215
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	0.68
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code name	no data	GT216
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	15 May 2012 (12 years ago)	12 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$79.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	862	48
Core clock speed	685 / 600 MHz	625 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	486 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	58 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	105 °C
Texture fill rate	no data	9.840
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.1277 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	no data	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	no data	1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3,GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	no data	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	790 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	25.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	VGADVIHDMI
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	S/PDIF + HDA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	no data	4.1
OpenGL	no data	3.1
OpenCL	no data	1.1
Vulkan	-	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−10.5%

21
+10.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

3.81

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Metro Exodus	3−4	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Dota 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Fortnite	10−12	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Metro Exodus	3−4	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
World of Tanks	40−45 +135%	16−18 −135%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Dota 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
World of Tanks	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Valorant	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Fortnite	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	0−1	0−1
Valorant	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

This is how HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and GT 220 compete in popular games:

GT 220 is 11% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in World of Tanks, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is ahead in 28 tests (85%)
there's a draw in 5 tests (15%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.11	0.57
Recency	15 May 2012	12 October 2009
Chip lithography	32 nm	40 nm

HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics has a 270.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while GeForce GT 220 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.