GeForce GT 220 vs Radeon HD 7670A

Place in performance ranking	769	1173
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code name	Turks	GT216
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	5 January 2012 (12 years ago)	12 October 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$79.99
Current price	no data	$121 (1.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	48
CUDA cores	no data	48
Core clock speed	600 MHz	625 MHz
Number of transistors	716 million	486 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	58 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	105 °C
Texture fill rate	14.40	9.840
Floating-point performance	576.0 gflops	144 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	6.6" (16.8 cm)
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	MXM Module	1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	790 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	25.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	VGADVIHDMI
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	S/PDIF + HDA

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	5.0	4.1
OpenGL	4.4	3.1
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7670A 2.72
+386%

GT 220 0.56

Radeon HD 7670A outperforms GeForce GT 220 by 386% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 7670A 1050
+384%

GT 220 217

Radeon HD 7670A outperforms GeForce GT 220 by 384% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

100−110
+376%

−376%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

+367%

3−4
−367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +358%	12−14 −358%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +344%	9−10 −344%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +358%	12−14 −358%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +344%	9−10 −344%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +358%	12−14 −358%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +344%	9−10 −344%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	27−30 +350%	6−7 −350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%