Radeon RX 6600 XT vs HD 7560D

Place in the ranking	1060	90
Place by popularity	not in top-100	87
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.10	63.38
Power efficiency	1.27	18.65
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Devastator Lite	Navi 23
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	2 October 2012 (12 years ago)	30 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$101	$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 XT has 63280% better value for money than HD 7560D.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	2048
Core clock speed	760 MHz	1968 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2589 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	12.16	331.4
Floating-point processing power	0.3891 TFLOPS	10.6 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	64
TMUs	16	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	190 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7560D 1.18

RX 6600 XT 42.80
+3527%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7560D 456

RX 6600 XT 16510
+3521%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7560D 1076

RX 6600 XT 39051
+3529%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7560D 4897

RX 6600 XT 88163
+1700%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7560D 791

RX 6600 XT 28342
+3483%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 7560D 6415

RX 6600 XT 156297
+2336%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18 −650%	135 +650%
1440p	2−3 −3750%	77 +3750%
4K	1−2 −4200%	43 +4200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.61	2.81
1440p	50.50	4.92
4K	101.00	8.81

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−2533%

79
+2533%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1700%	90−95 +1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2050%	85−90 +2050%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2500%	78 +2500%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −9000%	90−95 +9000%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −3400%	100−110 +3400%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −19800%	190−200 +19800%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1700%	108 +1700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1143%	170−180 +1143%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −4750%	95−100 +4750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −1888%	150−160 +1888%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −316%	130−140 +316%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1700%	90−95 +1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2050%	85−90 +2050%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2433%	76 +2433%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −9000%	90−95 +9000%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −3400%	100−110 +3400%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −19800%	190−200 +19800%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1700%	108 +1700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1143%	170−180 +1143%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −4750%	95−100 +4750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −2513%	209 +2513%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −700%	85−90 +700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −316%	130−140 +316%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1700%	90−95 +1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2050%	85−90 +2050%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2200%	69 +2200%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −9000%	90−95 +9000%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −19800%	190−200 +19800%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1567%	100 +1567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1021%	157 +1021%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −2188%	183 +2188%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −800%	99 +800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −90.6%	61 +90.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−4750%

95−100
+4750%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −8200%	80−85 +8200%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −3150%	65−70 +3150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −4600%	45−50 +4600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	50−55
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3900%	40 +3900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4800%	45−50 +4800%
Hitman 3	7−8 −857%	67 +857%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −2800%	116 +2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	60−65
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −3940%	200−210 +3940%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−1750%

70−75
+1750%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

35−40

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −2700%	28 +2700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	27−30
Far Cry 5	0−1	24−27

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1850%

35−40
+1850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	129 +0%	129 +0%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	106 +0%	106 +0%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	56 +0%	56 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%
Metro Exodus	98 +0%	98 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	118 +0%	118 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Hitman 3	33 +0%	33 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 +0%	54 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	14 +0%	14 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	61 +0%	61 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24 +0%	24 +0%

This is how HD 7560D and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6600 XT is 650% faster in 1080p
RX 6600 XT is 3750% faster in 1440p
RX 6600 XT is 4200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 19800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6600 XT is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.18	42.80
Recency	2 October 2012	30 July 2021
Chip lithography	32 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	160 Watt

HD 7560D has 146.2% lower power consumption.

RX 6600 XT, on the other hand, has a 3527.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7560D in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.