Radeon RX 6950 XT vs HD 7560D

Place in the ranking	1059	17
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.10	27.16
Power efficiency	1.26	14.96
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Devastator Lite	Navi 21
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	2 October 2012 (12 years ago)	10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$101	$1,099

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6950 XT has 27060% better value for money than HD 7560D.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	5120
Core clock speed	760 MHz	1925 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2324 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	335 Watt
Texture fill rate	12.16	743.7
Floating-point processing power	0.3891 TFLOPS	23.8 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	128
TMUs	16	320
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	IGP	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	16 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7560D 1.19

RX 6950 XT 73.06
+6039%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7560D 458

RX 6950 XT 28146
+6045%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7560D 1076

RX 6950 XT 72228
+6613%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7560D 4897

RX 6950 XT 119918
+2349%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7560D 791

RX 6950 XT 59882
+7470%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 7560D 6415

RX 6950 XT 229172
+3472%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	17 −1194%	220 +1194%
1440p	2−3 −6600%	134 +6600%
4K	1−2 −8200%	83 +8200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.94	5.00
1440p	50.50	8.20
4K	101.00	13.24

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−5267%

161
+5267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −2920%	150−160 +2920%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4667%	143 +4667%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −11600%	110−120 +11600%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −5933%	180−190 +5933%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −24100%	240−250 +24100%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1786%	260−270 +1786%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −6050%	120−130 +6050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −3813%	300−350 +3813%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −378%	150−160 +378%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −2920%	150−160 +2920%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4167%	128 +4167%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −11600%	110−120 +11600%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −5933%	180−190 +5933%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −24100%	240−250 +24100%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1786%	260−270 +1786%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −6050%	120−130 +6050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −5425%	442 +5425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1345%	150−160 +1345%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −378%	150−160 +378%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −2920%	150−160 +2920%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −3967%	122 +3967%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −11600%	110−120 +11600%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −24100%	240−250 +24100%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −2171%	318 +2171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −4850%	396 +4850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1864%	216 +1864%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −234%	107 +234%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−6050%

120−130
+6050%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −16500%	160−170 +16500%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −5500%	110−120 +5500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −8600%	85−90 +8600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	80−85
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −9200%	93 +9200%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −8300%	80−85 +8300%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1429%	100−110 +1429%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −6275%	255 +6275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	130−140
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −4700%	240−250 +4700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−2850%

110−120
+2850%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

65−70

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −6000%	60−65 +6000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −5800%	55−60 +5800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	50−55
Far Cry 5	0−1	50−55

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−4000%

80−85
+4000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Battlefield 5	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Battlefield 5	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

130−140

+0%

130−140

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Metro Exodus	132 +0%	132 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	294 +0%	294 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Hitman 3	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	144 +0%	144 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	46 +0%	46 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	172 +0%	172 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65 +0%	65 +0%

This is how HD 7560D and RX 6950 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6950 XT is 1194% faster in 1080p
RX 6950 XT is 6600% faster in 1440p
RX 6950 XT is 8200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6950 XT is 24100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6950 XT is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.19	73.06
Recency	2 October 2012	10 May 2022
Chip lithography	32 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	335 Watt

HD 7560D has 415.4% lower power consumption.

RX 6950 XT, on the other hand, has a 6039.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7560D in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.