Quadro T1000 vs Radeon HD 6480G

Place in performance ranking	1146	300
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	8.53
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Llano	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	15 June 2011 (13 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price	$362	$920

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 6480G and Quadro T1000 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	240	no data
Core clock speed	444 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	1000 Million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.744	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 6480G and Quadro T1000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	no data
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	8000 MHz
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	no data
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	N/A	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6480G 0.66

Quadro T1000 16.94
+2467%

Quadro T1000 outperforms Radeon HD 6480G by 2467% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 6480G 256

Quadro T1000 6547
+2457%

Quadro T1000 outperforms Radeon HD 6480G by 2457% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−2400%

75−80
+2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Hitman 3	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2445%	280−290 +2445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −2400%	200−210 +2400%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Hitman 3	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2445%	280−290 +2445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −2400%	200−210 +2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2445%	280−290 +2445%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%