Quadro M2000M vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

Place in performance ranking	149	451
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.03	2.39
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code name	Vega 10	GM107
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	27 June 2017 (6 years ago)	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Current price	$6074	$363

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

M2000M has 18% better value for money than Pro Vega 64.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	640
Core clock speed	1250 MHz	1038 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	1197 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	55 Watt
Texture fill rate	345.6	43.92
Floating-point performance	11,059 gflops	1,405 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Quadro M2000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1572 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	402.4 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	no data	+
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.125	+
CUDA	no data	5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 64 33.55
+275%

M2000M 8.95

Radeon Pro Vega 64 outperforms Quadro M2000M by 275% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 64 12984
+275%

M2000M 3465

Radeon Pro Vega 64 outperforms Quadro M2000M by 275% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Pro Vega 64 71464
+647%

M2000M 9561

Radeon Pro Vega 64 outperforms Quadro M2000M by 647% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pro Vega 64 74672
+713%

M2000M 9185

Radeon Pro Vega 64 outperforms Quadro M2000M by 713% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	130−140 +261%	36 −261%
4K	40−45 +264%	11 −264%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.55	8.95
Recency	27 June 2017	2 October 2015
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	55 Watt