GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Radeon HD 5850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5850 with GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 5850
2009
1 GB GDDR5, 151 Watt
5.15

GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms ATI HD 5850 by a whopping 210% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking588314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.818.34
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameCypressN18P-G0 / N18P-G61
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 September 2009 (14 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data
Current price$120 (0.4x MSRP)$1185

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 Max-Q has 930% better value for money than ATI HD 5850.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14401024
Core clock speed725 MHz1020 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1245 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate52.2072.00
Floating-point performance2,088.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 5850 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s112.1 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5850 5.15
GTX 1650 Max-Q 15.98
+210%

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon HD 5850 by 210% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 5850 1988
GTX 1650 Max-Q 6171
+210%

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon HD 5850 by 210% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI HD 5850 3401
GTX 1650 Max-Q 11083
+226%

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon HD 5850 by 226% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI HD 5850 13267
GTX 1650 Max-Q 30957
+133%

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon HD 5850 by 133% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p59
−205%
180−190
+205%
Full HD58
−5.2%
61
+5.2%
1440p9−10
−211%
28
+211%
4K6−7
−217%
19
+217%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Hitman 3 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 10−11 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Hitman 3 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 10−11 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 no data
Hitman 3 9−10 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 no data
Hitman 3 1−2 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6 no data
Metro Exodus 6−7 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−200%
90−95
+200%

This is how ATI HD 5850 and GTX 1650 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 205% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 5% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 211% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 217% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.15 15.98
Recency 30 September 2009 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 35 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5850 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5850
Radeon HD 5850
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 224 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 583 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.