Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon HD 5770

Place in performance ranking	623	57
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.66	10.06
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Juniper	TU102
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	13 October 2009 (14 years old)	13 August 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$159	$6,299
Current price	$103 (0.6x MSRP)	$3083 (0.5x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 6000 has 1424% better value for money than ATI HD 5770.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	800	4608
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1440 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	1,040 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	34.00	509.8
Floating-point performance	1,360.0 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	208 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	672.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5770 4.40

RTX 6000 48.72
+1007%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms Radeon HD 5770 by 1007% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 5770 1705

RTX 6000 18872
+1007%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms Radeon HD 5770 by 1007% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	24 −983%	260−270 +983%
Full HD	50 −1000%	550−600 +1000%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9

−963%

85−90
+963%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −983%	130−140 +983%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −967%	160−170 +967%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −971%	150−160 +971%
Hitman 3	10−11 −1000%	110−120 +1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −983%	130−140 +983%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −983%	130−140 +983%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −967%	160−170 +967%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −971%	150−160 +971%
Hitman 3	10−11 −1000%	110−120 +1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −983%	65−70 +983%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −983%	130−140 +983%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −983%	130−140 +983%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −971%	150−160 +971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
Hitman 3	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −991%	120−130 +991%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%

This is how ATI HD 5770 and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

RTX 6000 is 983% faster than ATI HD 5770

1080p resolution:

RTX 6000 is 1000% faster than ATI HD 5770

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	4.40	48.72
Recency	13 October 2009	13 August 2018
Cost	$159	$6299
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	260 Watt