FirePro M3900 vs GeForce GTX 480M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking741not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.02no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF100Seymour
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date25 May 2010 (15 years ago)19 October 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores352160
Core clock speed425 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate18.706.000
Floating-point processing power0.5984 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs448
L1 Cache704 KB16 KB
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0n/a
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Form factorno datachip-down
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s14 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity-+
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 May 2010 19 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 20 Watt

GTX 480M has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

FirePro M3900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 480M and FirePro M3900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 480M is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
GeForce GTX 480M
AMD FirePro M3900
FirePro M3900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 480M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 480M or FirePro M3900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.