ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs ATI HD 5670

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5670 and Radeon HD 4650 AGP, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 5670
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 64 Watt
2.08
+285%

ATI HD 5670 outperforms ATI HD 4650 AGP by a whopping 285% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8691218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.20no data
Power efficiency2.250.78
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRedwoodRV730
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 January 2010 (14 years ago)10 September 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400320
Core clock speed775 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors627 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)64 Watt48 Watt
Texture fill rate15.5019.20
Floating-point processing power0.62 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5670 2.08
+285%
ATI HD 4650 AGP 0.54

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5670 802
+287%
ATI HD 4650 AGP 207

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p26
+333%
6−7
−333%
Full HD32
+300%
8−9
−300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.72no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Hitman 3 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Hitman 3 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Hitman 3 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Hitman 3 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1

This is how ATI HD 5670 and ATI HD 4650 AGP compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5670 is 333% faster in 900p
  • ATI HD 5670 is 300% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.08 0.54
Recency 14 January 2010 10 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 64 Watt 48 Watt

ATI HD 5670 has a 285.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 4650 AGP, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 5670 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4650 AGP in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5670
Radeon HD 5670
ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Radeon HD 4650 AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 407 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 18 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4650 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.