Quadro FX 2500M vs Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics with Quadro FX 2500M, including specs and performance data.

HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
2012
1.89
+238%

HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics outperforms FX 2500M by a whopping 238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9161223
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.85
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameno dataG71
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date8 February 2012 (13 years ago)29 September 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores88032
Core clock speed400 / 600 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data278 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.00
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-III

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data38.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX119.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
+271%
7−8
−271%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data14.28

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Atomic Heart 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Valorant 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%
Atomic Heart 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+118%
16−18
−118%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 20−22
+81.8%
10−12
−81.8%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%
Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 20−22
+81.8%
10−12
−81.8%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%
Fortnite 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Valorant 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Atomic Heart 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and FX 2500M compete in popular games:

  • HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 271% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is ahead in 34 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.89 0.56
Recency 8 February 2012 29 September 2005
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm

HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics has a 237.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 2500M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 2500M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
Quadro FX 2500M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5
4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6620G HD 7670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3
4 votes

Rate Quadro FX 2500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics or Quadro FX 2500M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.