Quadro T1000 vs Radeon HD 5570

Place in performance ranking	999	295
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.02	8.57
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Redwood	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	9 February 2010 (14 years ago)	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$149	$920

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro T1000 has 42750% better value for money than ATI HD 5570.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	no data
Core clock speed	650 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	39 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.00	no data
Floating-point performance	520.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	165 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	667 - 900 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	no data
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	N/A	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5570 1.24

Quadro T1000 17.00
+1271%

Quadro T1000 outperforms Radeon HD 5570 by 1271% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 5570 479

Quadro T1000 6578
+1273%

Quadro T1000 outperforms Radeon HD 5570 by 1273% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	15 −1233%	200−210 +1233%
Full HD	22 −1264%	300−350 +1264%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−1150%

50−55
+1150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −1233%	120−130 +1233%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −1257%	95−100 +1257%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −1233%	120−130 +1233%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1250%	27−30 +1250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −1257%	95−100 +1257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1150%	100−105 +1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −1200%	65−70 +1200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1250%	27−30 +1250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Hitman 3	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −1257%	95−100 +1257%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1200%	65−70 +1200%