Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Place in the ranking	671	458
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	RDNA 2 (2022−2023)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Raphael	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	26 September 2022 (2 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	96
Boost clock speed	2200 MHz	no data
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	10 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	DDR4
Shared memory	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_2

DirectX 12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 4.38

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 9.82
+124%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 2338

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
+114%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−106%

35−40
+106%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −146%	30−35 +146%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Forza Horizon 4	17 −135%	40−45 +135%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −85.7%	24−27 +85.7%
Valorant	10−12 −245%	35−40 +245%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −146%	30−35 +146%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Dota 2	14 −157%	35−40 +157%
Far Cry 5	23 −73.9%	40−45 +73.9%
Fortnite	24−27 −123%	55−60 +123%
Forza Horizon 4	11 −264%	40−45 +264%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −157%	35−40 +157%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −103%	75−80 +103%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −85.7%	24−27 +85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Valorant	10−12 −245%	35−40 +245%
World of Tanks	70−75 −93.2%	140−150 +93.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −146%	30−35 +146%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Dota 2	37 +2.8%	35−40 −2.8%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%
Forza Horizon 4	9 −344%	40−45 +344%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −103%	75−80 +103%
Valorant	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Grand Theft Auto V	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −124%	65−70 +124%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
World of Tanks	30−35 −119%	70−75 +119%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −217%	18−20 +217%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −120%	21−24 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −267%	21−24 +267%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −100%	14−16 +100%
Valorant	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Dota 2	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −25%	20−22 +25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −25%	20−22 +25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Dota 2	16−18 −25%	20−22 +25%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Fortnite	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −333%	12−14 +333%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Valorant	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Fortnite	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

30−33

+0%

30−33

+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

55−60

+0%

55−60

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

24−27

+0%

24−27

+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

27−30

+0%

27−30

+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

10−11

+0%

10−11

+0%

This is how Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 106% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is 3% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 344% faster.

All in all, in popular games: