ATI Radeon X1650 vs Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Place in the ranking	664	1397
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	RDNA 2 (2022−2023)	R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code name	Raphael	RV516
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	26 September 2022 (2 years ago)	20 November 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	no data
Core clock speed	no data	635 MHz
Boost clock speed	2200 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	107 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	80 nm
Texture fill rate	no data	2.540
ROPs	no data	4
TMUs	no data	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	no data	256 MB
Memory bus width	no data	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	392 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	6.272 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_2	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	no data	3.0
OpenGL	no data	2.0
OpenCL	no data	N/A
Vulkan	-	N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9

0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Battlefield 5	10−11	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9	0−1
Far Cry 5	9−10	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Hitman 3	10−11	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +2800%	1−2 −2800%
Metro Exodus	9−10	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +4300%	1−2 −4300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Battlefield 5	10−11	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9	0−1
Far Cry 5	9−10	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Hitman 3	10−11	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +2800%	1−2 −2800%
Metro Exodus	9−10	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	11	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +4300%	1−2 −4300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9	0−1
Far Cry 5	9−10	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Hitman 3	10−11	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	9	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +4300%	1−2 −4300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	7−8	0−1
Hitman 3	9−10	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11	0−1
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +2600%	1−2 −2600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4	0−1
Hitman 3	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3	0−1
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	3−4	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

0−1

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.42	0.18
Recency	26 September 2022	20 November 2007
Chip lithography	6 nm	80 nm

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has a 2355.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook card while Radeon X1650 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.