Radeon RX 8040S vs Qualcomm Adreno 690
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 865 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 28.09 | no data |
| Architecture | no data | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 6 December 2018 (7 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 16 |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 | no data |
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
