ATI Radeon X1600 vs Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) with Radeon X1600, including specs and performance data.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
2022
4.43
+3308%

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) outperforms ATI X1600 by a whopping 3308% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6681437
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.33
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2022−2023)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameRaphaelRV516
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 September 2022 (2 years ago)2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speedno data635 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data105 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data27 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.540
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_29.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Elden Ring 10−11 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 17 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 0−1
Valorant 9−10 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Dota 2 14 0−1
Elden Ring 10−11 0−1
Far Cry 5 23 0−1
Fortnite 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 11 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1
Valorant 9−10 0−1
World of Tanks 70−75
+3600%
2−3
−3600%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Dota 2 37
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Far Cry 5 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Valorant 9−10 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4 0−1
Elden Ring 5−6 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
World of Tanks 30−35 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 12−14 0−1

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Elden Ring 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Valorant 4−5 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.43 0.13
Chip lithography 6 nm 90 nm

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has a 3307.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook card while Radeon X1600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
ATI Radeon X1600
Radeon X1600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 257 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 59 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.