Arc A530M vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Arc A530M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
2022
4.42

Arc A530M outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 317% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking675310
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.47
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2022−2023)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRaphaelDG2-256
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 September 2022 (2 years ago)1 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281536
Core clock speedno data900 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rateno data124.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.994 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data96
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−317%
75−80
+317%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−300%
35−40
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−356%
70−75
+356%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−300%
35−40
+300%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−436%
55−60
+436%
Fortnite 24−27
−292%
90−95
+292%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−274%
70−75
+274%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−500%
45−50
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%
Valorant 55−60
−144%
130−140
+144%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−356%
70−75
+356%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−199%
210−220
+199%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−300%
35−40
+300%
Dota 2 41
−315%
170−180
+315%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−436%
55−60
+436%
Fortnite 24−27
−292%
90−95
+292%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−274%
70−75
+274%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−500%
45−50
+500%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−300%
45−50
+300%
Valorant 55−60
−144%
130−140
+144%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−356%
70−75
+356%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−300%
35−40
+300%
Dota 2 37
−305%
150−160
+305%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−436%
55−60
+436%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−274%
70−75
+274%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−500%
45−50
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−300%
45−50
+300%
Valorant 55−60
−144%
130−140
+144%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−292%
90−95
+292%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−310%
120−130
+310%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−453%
160−170
+453%
Valorant 45−50
−276%
160−170
+276%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−4800%
45−50
+4800%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−388%
35−40
+388%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−330%
40−45
+330%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−417%
30−35
+417%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−300%
27−30
+300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−388%
35−40
+388%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−93.8%
30−35
+93.8%
Valorant 21−24
−362%
95−100
+362%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 24−27
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Dota 2 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−325%
16−18
+325%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Arc A530M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A530M is 317% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A530M is 4800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A530M is ahead in 58 tests (92%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.42 18.45
Recency 26 September 2022 1 August 2023

Arc A530M has a 317.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 10 months.

The Arc A530M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 261 vote

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 204 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) or Arc A530M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.