GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile vs Radeon E6465

Radeon E6460 Radeon E6465 Radeon E6760 MXM Radeon E6760 PCIe Radeon E8860 Radeon E8950 Radeon E9171 MCM Radeon E9172 MXM Radeon E9173 PCIe Radeon E9260 MXM Radeon E9260 PCIe Radeon E9390 PCIe
VS
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile RTX 3050 6GB Mobile RTX 3050 A Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Ti Mobile RTX 3060 Mobile RTX 3070 Mobile RTX 3070 Ti Mobile RTX 3080 Max-Q RTX 3080 Mobile RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q RTX 3080 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon E6465 and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon E6465
2015
2 GB GDDR5, 25 Watt
0.60

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile outperforms E6465 by a whopping 8415% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Radeon E6465 Radeon E6465
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile RTX 3080 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking119753
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.6630.77
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameCaicosGA103S
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 September 2015 (9 years ago)25 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1607424
Core clock speed600 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1260 MHz
Number of transistors370 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800292.3
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPS18.71 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon E6465 0.60
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 51.09
+8415%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon E6465 231
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 19716
+8435%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−14000%
141
+14000%
1440p1−2
−8800%
89
+8800%
4K0−161

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 136
+0%
136
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 118
+0%
118
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
+0%
124
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Hitman 3 162
+0%
162
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100
+0%
100
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
+0%
102
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Hitman 3 160
+0%
160
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 229
+0%
229
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87
+0%
87
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
+0%
91
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Hitman 3 143
+0%
143
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 194
+0%
194
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 200
+0%
200
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+0%
118
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 84
+0%
84
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70
+0%
70
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Hitman 3 107
+0%
107
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 154
+0%
154
+0%
Metro Exodus 93
+0%
93
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150
+0%
150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+0%
86
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 216
+0%
216
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
+0%
48
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+0%
28
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 93
+0%
93
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 42
+0%
42
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how Radeon E6465 and RTX 3080 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 14000% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 8800% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.60 51.09
Recency 29 September 2015 25 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 115 Watt

Radeon E6465 has 360% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 8415% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E6465 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon E6465
Radeon E6465
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon E6465 Radeon E6465
vs
GeForce G105M GeForce G105M
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Radeon E6465 Radeon E6465
vs
GT 640M Mac Edition GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
RSX Reality Synthesizer RSX Reality Synthesizer
vs
M3000 SE Quadro M3000 SE
Tegra X1 Tegra X1
vs
G92B G92B
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
GTX 980MX GeForce GTX 980MX
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
vs
T400 4 GB T400 4 GB
HD Graphics 520 HD Graphics 520
vs
GT 120 OEM GeForce GT 120 OEM
RTX 3070 Mobile GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
vs
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3 3020
GT 730M GeForce GT 730M
vs
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
M4000M Quadro M4000M
vs
RX 5800 XT Radeon RX 5800 XT
RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700
vs
RX 6450M Radeon RX 6450M
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
vs
K1000M Quadro K1000M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 1 vote

Rate Radeon E6465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 280 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.