Quadro RTX 6000 vs GeForce GT 730M

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GT 730M
2.10

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GT 730M by 2219% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking82356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.059.94
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGK107TU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years old)13 August 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299
Current price$1000 $3083 (0.5x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 6000 has 19780% better value for money than GT 730M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844608
Core clock speed725 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate23.20509.8
Floating-point performance552.2 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 730M and Quadro RTX 6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Standard memory configurationDDR3/GDDR5no data
Memory bus width64/128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 - 2000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+no data
HDCP content protection+no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 730M 2.10
RTX 6000 48.70
+2219%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GT 730M by 2219% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 730M 815
RTX 6000 18877
+2216%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GT 730M by 2216% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GT 730M 3229
RTX 6000 137910
+4171%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GT 730M by 4171% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GT 730M 3025
RTX 6000 113762
+3661%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GT 730M by 3661% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GT 730M 2459
RTX 6000 159550
+6388%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GT 730M by 6388% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
−2173%
500−550
+2173%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Hitman 3 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Hitman 3 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Hitman 3 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%

This is how GT 730M and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 6000 is 2173% faster than GT 730M

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.10 48.70
Recency 1 January 2013 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 260 Watt

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 730M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 730M is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
GeForce GT 730M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 231 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 120 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.