Radeon Pro 555 vs 860M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 860M with Radeon Pro 555, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 860M
2025
15 Watt
10.98
+47.4%

860M outperforms Pro 555 by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking426534
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency54.657.42
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameStrix PointPolaris 21
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release dateMarch 2025 (recently)5 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768
Core clock speed400 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHzno data
Number of transistors34,000 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate96.0040.80
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPS1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3248
Ray Tracing Cores8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1275 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data81.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 860M 10.98
+47.4%
Pro 555 7.45

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 860M 4626
+47.3%
Pro 555 3140

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−28%
32
+28%
4K18−20
+38.5%
13
−38.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+56.4%
35−40
−56.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+48.5%
30−35
−48.5%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+56.4%
35−40
−56.4%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+42.3%
26
−42.3%
Fortnite 65−70
−24.2%
82
+24.2%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+54.8%
31
−54.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+66.7%
24
−66.7%
Valorant 100−110
+27.8%
75−80
−27.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+48.5%
30−35
−48.5%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+56.4%
35−40
−56.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+34.7%
120−130
−34.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+54.2%
24
−54.2%
Fortnite 65−70
+128%
29
−128%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+84.6%
26
−84.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
−20.8%
29
+20.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+53.3%
14−16
−53.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+90.5%
21
−90.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+26.1%
23
−26.1%
Valorant 100−110
+27.8%
75−80
−27.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+48.5%
30−35
−48.5%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+68.2%
22
−68.2%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+167%
18
−167%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+208%
13
−208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+107%
14
−107%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+187%
23
−187%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+46.6%
55−60
−46.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Valorant 120−130
+41.9%
85−90
−41.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Valorant 55−60
+51.3%
35−40
−51.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how Radeon 860M and Pro 555 compete in popular games:

  • Pro 555 is 28% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 860M is 38% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 860M is 208% faster.
  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 555 is 24% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 860M is ahead in 49 tests (77%)
  • Pro 555 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (20%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.98 7.45
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

Radeon 860M has a 47.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 860M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 555 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 860M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 555 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
AMD Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 555

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 96 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 860M or Radeon Pro 555, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.