Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon 780M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 780M with Arc Graphics 140V, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 780M
2024
15 Watt
15.67
+33.2%

780M outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking350424
Place by popularity43not in top-100
Power efficiency84.04no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Xe² (2024)
GPU code namePhoenixLunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 January 2024 (1 year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7688
Core clock speed800 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2900 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate139.2no data
Floating-point processing power8.909 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs48no data
Ray Tracing Cores12no data
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependentno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 780M 15.67
+33.2%
Arc Graphics 140V 11.76

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 780M Samples: 6566 6931
+33.2%
Arc Graphics 140V Samples: 1576 5202

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 780M 12819
+12.5%
Arc Graphics 140V 11396

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon 780M 41636
+6.6%
Arc Graphics 140V 39055

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 780M 7997
Arc Graphics 140V 9831
+22.9%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 780M 48112
Arc Graphics 140V 54539
+13.4%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Radeon 780M 2822
Arc Graphics 140V 4038
+43.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
−14.3%
40
+14.3%
1440p22
−31.8%
29
+31.8%
4K13
−84.6%
24
+84.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 119
+36.8%
87
−36.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+50%
24−27
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 35
−17.1%
41
+17.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+30.9%
55−60
−30.9%
Counter-Strike 2 82
−3.7%
85
+3.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+19.2%
24−27
−19.2%
Far Cry 5 45
−15.6%
52
+15.6%
Fortnite 90−95
+26%
70−75
−26%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+30.2%
50−55
−30.2%
Forza Horizon 5 65
−7.7%
70
+7.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 26
−34.6%
35
+34.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+37%
45−50
−37%
Valorant 130−140
+20.9%
110−120
−20.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+30.9%
55−60
−30.9%
Counter-Strike 2 39
−7.7%
42
+7.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+20.8%
170−180
−20.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
−8.3%
24−27
+8.3%
Dota 2 100−110
+34.7%
75−80
−34.7%
Far Cry 5 41
−14.6%
47
+14.6%
Fortnite 90−95
+26%
70−75
−26%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+30.2%
50−55
−30.2%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+1.7%
59
−1.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+2.3%
44
−2.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 20
−15%
23
+15%
Metro Exodus 29
+11.5%
24−27
−11.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+37%
45−50
−37%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
−34.8%
62
+34.8%
Valorant 130−140
−3%
137
+3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+30.9%
55−60
−30.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−13%
24−27
+13%
Dota 2 100−110
+34.7%
75−80
−34.7%
Far Cry 5 39
−12.8%
44
+12.8%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+30.2%
50−55
−30.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 15
−26.7%
19
+26.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+37%
45−50
−37%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+3.6%
28
−3.6%
Valorant 130−140
+20.9%
110−120
−20.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+26%
70−75
−26%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+30.5%
95−100
−30.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
+0%
18
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+57.8%
100−110
−57.8%
Valorant 160−170
+44.7%
114
−44.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+41.2%
30−35
−41.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Far Cry 5 27
−37%
37
+37%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 15
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 21
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 90−95
+38.2%
65−70
−38.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+47.1%
16−18
−47.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
Dota 2 55−60
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%
Far Cry 5 12
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+31.8%
21−24
−31.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

This is how Radeon 780M and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140V is 14% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 140V is 32% faster in 1440p
  • Arc Graphics 140V is 85% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 780M is 63% faster.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc Graphics 140V is 37% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 780M performs better in 43 tests (68%)
  • Arc Graphics 140V performs better in 19 tests (30%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.67 11.76
Recency 31 January 2024 24 September 2024
Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm

Radeon 780M has a 33.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 780M is a desktop graphics card while Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2183 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 54 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 780M or Arc Graphics 140V, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.