Radeon 780M vs HD 4850 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

ATI HD 4850 X2
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 250 Watt
2.93

780M outperforms HD 4850 X2 by a whopping 527% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking747283
Place by popularitynot in top-10057
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 3
GPU code nameR700Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 November 2008 (15 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$420 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800768
Core clock speed625 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data3000 MHz
Number of transistors956 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate25.00139.2
Floating-point performance2x 1,000.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 4850 X2 and Radeon 780M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1990 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth63.68 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4850 X2 2.93
Radeon 780M 18.36
+527%

780M outperforms HD 4850 X2 by 527% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 4850 X2 1132
Radeon 780M 7090
+526%

780M outperforms HD 4850 X2 by 526% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−620%
36
+620%
1440p3−4
−600%
21
+600%
4K2−3
−600%
14
+600%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.93 18.36
Recency 7 November 2008 5 January 2023
Chip lithography 55 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 54 Watt

The Radeon 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4850 X2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4850 X2 is a desktop card while Radeon 780M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
Radeon HD 4850 X2
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4850 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1069 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.