Quadro K2000M Embedded vs Radeon 780M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking298not rated
Place by popularity47not in top-100
Power efficiency84.38no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code namePhoenixEXK107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)22 March 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed800 MHz835 MHz
Boost clock speed2700 MHz1058 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate129.633.86
Floating-point processing power8.294 TFLOPS0.8125 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs4832
Ray Tracing Cores12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.0 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.1
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 December 2023 22 March 2012
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

Radeon 780M has an age advantage of 11 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 780M and Quadro K2000M Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 780M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K2000M Embedded is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded
Quadro K2000M Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1469 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K2000M Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.