Radeon 780M vs GeForce GTX 660

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 with Radeon 780M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 140 Watt
10.35

Radeon 780M outperforms GTX 660 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking405283
Place by popularity6957
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.41no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3
GPU code nameGK106Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 September 2012 (11 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data
Current price$172 (0.8x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960768
CUDA cores960no data
Core clock speed980 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz3000 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate78.4 billion/sec139.2
Floating-point performance1,981 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 660 and Radeon 780M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length9.5" (24.1 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsOne 6-pinNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192-bit GDDR5System Shared
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 660 10.35
Radeon 780M 18.35
+77.3%

Radeon 780M outperforms GeForce GTX 660 by 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 660 3999
Radeon 780M 7086
+77.2%

Radeon 780M outperforms GeForce GTX 660 by 77% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 660 5040
Radeon 780M 7935
+57.4%

Radeon 780M outperforms GeForce GTX 660 by 57% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
+30.6%
36
−30.6%
1440p10−12
−110%
21
+110%
4K7−8
−100%
14
+100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−85.7%
39
+85.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−93.8%
30−35
+93.8%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−100%
60−65
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−106%
35−40
+106%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−93.8%
31
+93.8%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−79.2%
40−45
+79.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−81.5%
45−50
+81.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−86.7%
80−85
+86.7%
Hitman 3 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−94%
97
+94%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−103%
60−65
+103%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−88.9%
50−55
+88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−82.9%
64
+82.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−95.2%
41
+95.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−93.8%
30−35
+93.8%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−100%
60−65
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−106%
35−40
+106%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−100%
24
+100%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−79.2%
40−45
+79.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−81.5%
45−50
+81.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−86.7%
80−85
+86.7%
Hitman 3 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−82.5%
70−75
+82.5%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−110%
21
+110%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−88.9%
50−55
+88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−96.3%
53
+96.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−91.7%
46
+91.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−86.7%
55−60
+86.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−93.8%
30−35
+93.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−106%
35−40
+106%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−91.7%
23
+91.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−79.2%
40−45
+79.2%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−86.7%
80−85
+86.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−96.3%
53
+96.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−91.7%
46
+91.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−81.3%
29
+81.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−80%
18
+80%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−88.9%
50−55
+88.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−92.9%
27
+92.9%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Hitman 3 12−14
−83.3%
21−24
+83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−106%
35−40
+106%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−88.9%
30−35
+88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−77.8%
32
+77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−100%
20
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Hitman 3 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−87.5%
15
+87.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−78.6%
24−27
+78.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%

This is how GTX 660 and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 660 is 31% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 780M is 110% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 780M is 100% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.35 18.35
Recency 6 September 2012 5 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 54 Watt

The Radeon 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 is a desktop card while Radeon 780M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GeForce GTX 660
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 4024 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1076 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.