RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon 740M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Radeon 740M
2023
30 Watt
9.00

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Radeon 740M by a whopping 305% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking451120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3Ada Lovelace
GPU code namePhoenixno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 May 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2563072
Core clock speed1500 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2500 MHzno data
Number of transistors25,390 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt (30 - 15 Watt TGP)115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate40.00no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon 740M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared16000 MHz
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−293%
110−120
+293%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Hitman 3 20−22
−300%
80−85
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−293%
110−120
+293%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Hitman 3 20−22
−300%
80−85
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Hitman 3 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Hitman 3 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.00 36.46
Recency 23 May 2023 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount System Shared 8 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 115 Watt

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 740M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 29 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.