RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon 680M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 680M with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 680M
2023
50 Watt
8.15

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 680M by a whopping 317% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking521154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.1254.64
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRembrandt+AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683072
Core clock speed2000 MHz1635 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2115 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate105.6203.0
Floating-point processing power3.379 TFLOPS12.99 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs4896
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Cores1224
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KB3 MB
L2 Cache2 MB12 MB
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 680M 8.15
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 33.95
+317%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 680M Samples: 3 3604
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile Samples: 1314 15013
+317%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 680M 10399
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 28910
+178%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon 680M 34600
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 37844
+9.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 680M 6865
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 21379
+211%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 680M 43225
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 115230
+167%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Radeon 680M 2303
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 8095
+251%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD37
−305%
150−160
+305%
1440p17
−312%
70−75
+312%
4K11
−309%
45−50
+309%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−313%
190−200
+313%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
−295%
150−160
+295%
Hogwarts Legacy 34
−312%
140−150
+312%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−313%
190−200
+313%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
−293%
110−120
+293%
Far Cry 5 38
−295%
150−160
+295%
Fortnite 50−55
−315%
220−230
+315%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Forza Horizon 5 52
−304%
210−220
+304%
Hogwarts Legacy 22
−309%
90−95
+309%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Valorant 85−90
−302%
350−400
+302%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−313%
190−200
+313%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−307%
550−600
+307%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
−305%
85−90
+305%
Dota 2 71
−308%
290−300
+308%
Far Cry 5 35
−300%
140−150
+300%
Fortnite 50−55
−315%
220−230
+315%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Forza Horizon 5 46
−313%
190−200
+313%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
−289%
140−150
+289%
Hogwarts Legacy 20
−300%
80−85
+300%
Metro Exodus 23
−313%
95−100
+313%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
−300%
160−170
+300%
Valorant 85−90
−302%
350−400
+302%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−289%
70−75
+289%
Dota 2 61
−310%
250−260
+310%
Far Cry 5 33
−294%
130−140
+294%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Hogwarts Legacy 14
−293%
55−60
+293%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−296%
95−100
+296%
Valorant 146
−311%
600−650
+311%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
−315%
220−230
+315%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−306%
65−70
+306%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−303%
270−280
+303%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−312%
70−75
+312%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−309%
180−190
+309%
Valorant 95−100
−312%
400−450
+312%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−300%
80−85
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−300%
40−45
+300%
Far Cry 5 21
−305%
85−90
+305%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−312%
70−75
+312%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−300%
80−85
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−285%
50−55
+285%
Valorant 45−50
−300%
180−190
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−300%
16−18
+300%
Dota 2 18
−289%
70−75
+289%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%

This is how Radeon 680M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is 305% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is 312% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is 309% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.15 33.95
Recency 3 January 2023 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 316.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 680M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 680M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1110 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 39 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 680M or RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.