Radeon 740M vs RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.72
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameAD107Phoenix2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)31 January 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072256
Core clock speed1635 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHz2800 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 million20,900 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate203.044.80
Floating-point processing power12.99 TFLOPS2.867 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs9616
Tensor Cores96no data
Ray Tracing Cores244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

Radeon 740M has an age advantage of 10 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and Radeon 740M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 740M is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 22 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 132 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation or Radeon 740M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.