RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Radeon 680M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 680M with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 680M
2023
50 Watt
8.38

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms 680M by a whopping 751% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking53622
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.83
Power efficiency11.958.48
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameRembrandt+GB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76824064
Core clock speed2000 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate105.61,968
Floating-point processing power3.379 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs48752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Cores12188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared96 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 680M 8.38
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 71.35
+751%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 680M 3334
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 28386
+751%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD37
−711%
300−350
+711%
1440p17
−724%
140−150
+724%
4K11
−718%
90−95
+718%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data28.55
1440pno data61.18
4Kno data95.17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−733%
350−400
+733%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
−689%
300−310
+689%
Dead Island 2 62
−706%
500−550
+706%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−733%
300−310
+733%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−733%
350−400
+733%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
−721%
230−240
+721%
Dead Island 2 52
−669%
400−450
+669%
Far Cry 5 38
−689%
300−310
+689%
Fortnite 45−50
−716%
400−450
+716%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−733%
300−310
+733%
Forza Horizon 5 52
−669%
400−450
+669%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−728%
240−250
+728%
Valorant 80−85
−693%
650−700
+693%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−733%
300−310
+733%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−733%
350−400
+733%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−727%
1050−1100
+727%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
−710%
170−180
+710%
Dead Island 2 40
−650%
300−310
+650%
Dota 2 71
−745%
600−650
+745%
Far Cry 5 35
−729%
290−300
+729%
Fortnite 45−50
−716%
400−450
+716%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−733%
300−310
+733%
Forza Horizon 5 46
−661%
350−400
+661%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
−733%
300−310
+733%
Metro Exodus 23
−726%
190−200
+726%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−728%
240−250
+728%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
−650%
300−310
+650%
Valorant 80−85
−693%
650−700
+693%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−733%
300−310
+733%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−733%
150−160
+733%
Dead Island 2 32
−744%
270−280
+744%
Dota 2 61
−720%
500−550
+720%
Far Cry 5 33
−748%
280−290
+748%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−733%
300−310
+733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−728%
240−250
+728%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−733%
200−210
+733%
Valorant 146
−722%
1200−1250
+722%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−716%
400−450
+716%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−686%
110−120
+686%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
−706%
500−550
+706%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−724%
140−150
+724%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−632%
300−310
+632%
Valorant 90−95
−715%
750−800
+715%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−733%
150−160
+733%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−750%
85−90
+750%
Dead Island 2 14−16
−686%
110−120
+686%
Far Cry 5 21
−710%
170−180
+710%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−742%
160−170
+742%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−724%
140−150
+724%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−724%
140−150
+724%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Dead Island 2 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−742%
160−170
+742%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−746%
110−120
+746%
Valorant 40−45
−733%
350−400
+733%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−650%
30−33
+650%
Dead Island 2 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Dota 2 18
−733%
150−160
+733%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−746%
110−120
+746%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%

This is how Radeon 680M and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 711% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 724% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 718% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.38 71.35
Recency 3 January 2023 18 March 2025
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 600 Watt

Radeon 680M has 1100% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 751.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 680M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 680M is a notebook card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1073 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 680M or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.