RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Radeon 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 630 with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 630
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.79

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms 630 by a whopping 2169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7376
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.86
Power efficiency5.3710.15
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code namePolaris 23GB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 May 2019 (5 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51224064
Core clock speed1082 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1218 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate38.981,968
Floating-point processing power1.247 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs16192
TMUs32752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB96 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 630 3.79
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 85.99
+2169%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 630 1514
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 34320
+2167%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−2131%
290−300
+2131%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−2131%
290−300
+2131%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−2100%
220−230
+2100%
Fortnite 21−24
−2043%
450−500
+2043%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1959%
350−400
+1959%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Valorant 50−55
−2112%
1150−1200
+2112%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−2131%
290−300
+2131%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−2097%
1450−1500
+2097%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Dota 2 30−35
−2106%
750−800
+2106%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−2100%
220−230
+2100%
Fortnite 21−24
−2043%
450−500
+2043%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1959%
350−400
+1959%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
−2082%
240−250
+2082%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−2082%
240−250
+2082%
Valorant 50−55
−2112%
1150−1200
+2112%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Dota 2 30−35
−2106%
750−800
+2106%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−2100%
220−230
+2100%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1959%
350−400
+1959%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−2082%
240−250
+2082%
Valorant 50−55
−2112%
1150−1200
+2112%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−2043%
450−500
+2043%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−2043%
600−650
+2043%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−2122%
600−650
+2122%
Valorant 35−40
−2079%
850−900
+2079%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−2088%
350−400
+2088%
Valorant 18−20
−2122%
400−450
+2122%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Dota 2 12−14
−2150%
270−280
+2150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.79 85.99
Recency 13 May 2019 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 600 Watt

Radeon 630 has 1100% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 2168.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 630 is a notebook card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 630 or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.