Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon 625

Place in performance ranking	761	500
Place by popularity	not in top-100	68
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.45	no data
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 24	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	12 August 2019 (4 years ago)	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price	$68	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	80
Core clock speed	no data	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	1,550 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.58	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon 625 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12_1
Shader Model	6.3	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	6−7 −200%	18 +200%
1440p	3−4 −233%	10 +233%
4K	5−6 −200%	15 +200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6
−180%

+180%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Battlefield 5	8−9 −175%	21−24 +175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −225%	13 +225%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −183%	16−18 +183%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −200%	35−40 +200%
Hitman 3	5−6 −220%	16 +220%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −220%	32 +220%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −200%	30 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −220%	16 +220%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Battlefield 5	8−9 −175%	21−24 +175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10 +233%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −183%	16−18 +183%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −200%	35−40 +200%
Hitman 3	5−6 −220%	16 +220%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −183%	30−35 +183%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −200%	24 +200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −175%	22 +175%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −172%	49 +172%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −300%	8 +300%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −183%	16−18 +183%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −200%	35−40 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −220%	16 +220%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −186%	20 +186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −175%	11 +175%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −190%	27−30 +190%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
−200%

21−24

+200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −200%	12 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
Hitman 3	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −220%	16−18 +220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −233%	10 +233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
−225%

12−14

+225%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	2−3