GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs Radeon 620

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 620 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 620
2019
4 GB DDR3, GDDR5, 50 Watt
2.33

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms Radeon 620 by a whopping 997% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking850209
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 24GN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 August 2019 (5 years ago)6 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842560
Core clock speedno data1237 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHz1492 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate24.58no data
Floating-point performance0.7864 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_2
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 620 2.33
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 25.56
+997%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 620 1730
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 11960
+591%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−1050%
69
+1050%
1440p3−4
−1067%
35
+1067%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1520%
81
+1520%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−2633%
80−85
+2633%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1180%
64
+1180%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1350%
55−60
+1350%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1227%
140−150
+1227%
Hitman 3 7−8
−629%
50−55
+629%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−505%
110−120
+505%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−8500%
85−90
+8500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−178%
100−110
+178%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−2633%
80−85
+2633%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−820%
46
+820%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1350%
55−60
+1350%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1227%
140−150
+1227%
Hitman 3 7−8
−629%
50−55
+629%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−505%
110−120
+505%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−8500%
85−90
+8500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−682%
86
+682%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−315%
50−55
+315%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−178%
100−110
+178%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−680%
39
+680%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1350%
55−60
+1350%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1227%
140−150
+1227%
Hitman 3 7−8
−629%
50−55
+629%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−505%
110−120
+505%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−591%
76
+591%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−285%
50
+285%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−178%
100−110
+178%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1167%
35−40
+1167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−867%
27−30
+867%
Hitman 3 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−767%
50−55
+767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3600%
37
+3600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−985%
140−150
+985%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−740%
40−45
+740%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 24−27
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 10−12

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−633%
21−24
+633%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
+0%
57
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how Radeon 620 and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 1050% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 1067% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 8500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is ahead in 56 tests (80%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (20%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.33 25.56
Recency 12 August 2019 6 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 60 Watt

Radeon 620 has 20% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 997% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 620
Radeon 620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 65 votes

Rate Radeon 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 540 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.