Quadro P4200 vs Radeon 530

Place in performance ranking	779	196
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.53	7.80
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Meso	GP104
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	21 March 2017 (7 years ago)	7 May 2018 (6 years ago)
Current price	$627	$1526

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P4200 has 1372% better value for money than Radeon 530.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2304
Core clock speed	1024 MHz	1215 MHz
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz	1480 MHz
Number of transistors	1,550 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.50	237.2
Floating-point performance	784.1 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon 530 and Quadro P4200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3/GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	7132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	192.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12.0	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 530 2.63

Quadro P4200 25.11
+855%

Quadro P4200 outperforms Radeon 530 by 855% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Radeon 530 1017

Quadro P4200 10685
+951%

Quadro P4200 outperforms Radeon 530 by 951% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Radeon 530 5015

Quadro P4200 34868
+595%

Quadro P4200 outperforms Radeon 530 by 595% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−841%

160−170
+841%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16	no data
Battlefield 5	4−5	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6	no data
Far Cry 5	10	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	12	no data
Forza Horizon 4	20	no data
Hitman 3	5−6	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20	no data
Metro Exodus	13	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	13	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	15	no data
Battlefield 5	4−5	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6	no data
Far Cry 5	5−6	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8	no data
Forza Horizon 4	32	no data
Hitman 3	5−6	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	10	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	11	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6	no data
Far Cry 5	5−6	no data
Forza Horizon 4	10−12	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	no data
Far Cry 5	4−5	no data
Forza Horizon 4	4−5	no data
Hitman 3	8−9	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2	no data
Far Cry 5	1−2	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4	no data
Metro Exodus	5−6	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

40−45
−830%

400−450

+830%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −830%	400−450 +830%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −826%	750−800 +826%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

40−45
−830%

400−450

+830%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −820%	230−240 +820%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −838%	450−500 +838%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −809%	500−550 +809%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	20−22 −850%	190−200 +850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −844%	170−180 +844%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −826%	250−260 +826%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −817%	55−60 +817%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −782%	300−310 +782%

This is how Radeon 530 and Quadro P4200 compete in popular games:

Quadro P4200 is 841% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.63	25.11
Recency	21 March 2017	7 May 2018
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	115 Watt