Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon 530

Place in the ranking	820	246
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.69	21.69
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Weston	GP104
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	1792
Core clock speed	730 MHz	1139 MHz
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz	1404 MHz
Number of transistors	1,550 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.58	157.2
Floating-point processing power	0.7864 TFLOPS	5.032 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	64
TMUs	24	112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3/GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	168.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 530 2.65

P3200 Max-Q 23.37
+782%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 530 1028

P3200 Max-Q 9077
+783%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−767%

130−140
+767%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	8 −775%	70−75 +775%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −764%	95−100 +764%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Metro Exodus	9 −733%	75−80 +733%
Red Dead Redemption 2	13 −746%	110−120 +746%
Valorant	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%
Dota 2	18 −733%	150−160 +733%
Far Cry 5	12 −733%	100−105 +733%
Fortnite	14−16 −757%	120−130 +757%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −764%	95−100 +764%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Grand Theft Auto V	12 −733%	100−105 +733%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12 −733%	100−105 +733%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −750%	85−90 +750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5 −700%	40−45 +700%
Valorant	8 −775%	70−75 +775%
World of Tanks	36 −733%	300−310 +733%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%
Dota 2	28 −757%	240−250 +757%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −775%	140−150 +775%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −764%	95−100 +764%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −780%	220−230 +780%
Valorant	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −733%	150−160 +733%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
World of Tanks	18−20 −733%	150−160 +733%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Valorant	9−10 −733%	75−80 +733%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −775%	140−150 +775%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −767%	130−140 +767%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −767%	130−140 +767%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Dota 2	16−18 −775%	140−150 +775%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Fortnite	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Valorant	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%

This is how Radeon 530 and P3200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

P3200 Max-Q is 767% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.65	23.37
Recency	18 April 2017	21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt

Radeon 530 has 50% lower power consumption.

P3200 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 781.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 530 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 530 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Radeon 530

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon 530

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

256 DDR

Mobility FireGL 7800

Iris Plus Graphics G4

Graphics 384SP Mobile

RX 560

P2000 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 736 votes

Rate Radeon 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

4.7 21 vote

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 530 or Quadro P3200 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.