RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile with RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, including specs and performance data.
PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile by an impressive 69% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 101 | 20 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 34.14 | 78.51 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) |
| GPU code name | GB203 | GB203 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 19 March 2025 (less than a year ago) | 11 August 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 10496 | 8960 |
| Core clock speed | 990 MHz | 790 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1337 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 45,600 million | 45,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 496.9 | 374.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 31.8 TFLOPS | 23.96 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 112 | 96 |
| TMUs | 328 | 280 |
| Tensor Cores | 328 | 280 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82 | 70 |
| L1 Cache | 10.3 MB | 8.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 48 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 167 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 896.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| CUDA | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| DLSS | + | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 117
−62.4%
| 190−200
+62.4%
|
| 1440p | 80
−62.5%
| 130−140
+62.5%
|
| 4K | 45
−66.7%
| 75−80
+66.7%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−60%
|
8−9
+60%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−60%
|
8−9
+60%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−52.2%
|
35−40
+52.2%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 8−9
−50%
|
12−14
+50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−60%
|
8−9
+60%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−52.2%
|
35−40
+52.2%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−60%
|
8−9
+60%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−60%
|
24−27
+60%
|
| Valorant | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
This is how RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF compete in popular games:
- RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 62% faster in 1080p
- RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 63% faster in 1440p
- RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 67% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 40.07 | 67.89 |
| Recency | 19 March 2025 | 11 August 2025 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 70 Watt |
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF has a 69.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 35.7% lower power consumption.
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
