RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile with RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
2025
24 GB GDDR7, 95 Watt
40.08

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell outperforms RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1019
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency34.0833.15
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGB203GB203
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1049610496
Core clock speed990 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1515 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors45,600 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate496.9858.4
Floating-point processing power31.8 TFLOPS54.94 TFLOPS
ROPs112112
TMUs328328
Tensor Cores328328
Ray Tracing Cores8282
L1 Cache10.3 MB10.3 MB
L2 Cache64 MB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount24 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth896.0 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.41.4
CUDA12.012.0
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD115
−100%
230−240
+100%
1440p81
−97.5%
160−170
+97.5%
4K47
−102%
95−100
+102%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
−94%
450−500
+94%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
−98%
200−210
+98%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
−96.1%
200−210
+96.1%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150
−100%
280−290
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
−94%
450−500
+94%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
−98%
200−210
+98%
Far Cry 5 130−140
−100%
270−280
+100%
Fortnite 180−190
−91.3%
350−400
+91.3%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−82.9%
300−310
+82.9%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
−101%
270−280
+101%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
−96.1%
200−210
+96.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−84%
300−310
+84%
Valorant 240−250
−86%
450−500
+86%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150
−100%
280−290
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
−94%
450−500
+94%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−97.8%
550−600
+97.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
−98%
200−210
+98%
Far Cry 5 130−140
−100%
270−280
+100%
Fortnite 180−190
−91.3%
350−400
+91.3%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−82.9%
300−310
+82.9%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
−101%
270−280
+101%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
−104%
280−290
+104%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
−96.1%
200−210
+96.1%
Metro Exodus 100−110
−102%
210−220
+102%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−84%
300−310
+84%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
−91.1%
300−310
+91.1%
Valorant 240−250
−86%
450−500
+86%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
−100%
280−290
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
−98%
200−210
+98%
Far Cry 5 130−140
−100%
270−280
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−82.9%
300−310
+82.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
−96.1%
200−210
+96.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−84%
300−310
+84%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
−91.1%
300−310
+91.1%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 180−190
−91.3%
350−400
+91.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−98.2%
220−230
+98.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
−99.3%
600−650
+99.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
−102%
180−190
+102%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−103%
130−140
+103%
Valorant 270−280
−101%
550−600
+101%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
−96.3%
210−220
+96.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−100%
210−220
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−100%
250−260
+100%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
−102%
170−180
+102%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
−100%
230−240
+100%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
−100%
190−200
+100%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−100%
80−85
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−100%
140−150
+100%
Valorant 250−260
−93.1%
500−550
+93.1%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
−103%
140−150
+103%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−89.7%
110−120
+89.7%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−102%
170−180
+102%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
−96.4%
55−60
+96.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−93.5%
120−130
+93.5%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−89.7%
110−120
+89.7%

This is how RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile and RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 100% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 98% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 102% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.08 82.08
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 200 Watt

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile has 110.5% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 104.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 110 votes

Rate RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile or RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.