Arc Pro B50 vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile with Arc Pro B50, including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
2025
24 GB GDDR7, 95 Watt
40.08
+42.1%

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms Pro B50 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking101216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.54
Power efficiency34.1232.59
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameGB203BMG-G21
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)5 September 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores104962048
Core clock speed990 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1515 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors45,600 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate496.9332.8
Floating-point processing power31.8 TFLOPS10.65 TFLOPS
ROPs11216
TMUs328128
Tensor Cores328no data
Ray Tracing Cores8216
L1 Cache10.3 MBno data
L2 Cache64 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth896.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.41.4
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD115
+43.8%
80−85
−43.8%
1440p81
+47.3%
55−60
−47.3%
4K47
+56.7%
30−35
−56.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.36
1440pno data6.35
4Kno data11.63

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+45%
160−170
−45%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+44.3%
70−75
−44.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+45.7%
70−75
−45.7%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150
+47.4%
95−100
−47.4%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+45%
160−170
−45%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+44.3%
70−75
−44.3%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+42.1%
95−100
−42.1%
Fortnite 180−190
+52.5%
120−130
−52.5%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+49.1%
110−120
−49.1%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+48.9%
90−95
−48.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+45.7%
70−75
−45.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+48.2%
110−120
−48.2%
Valorant 240−250
+42.4%
170−180
−42.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150
+47.4%
95−100
−47.4%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+45%
160−170
−45%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+46.3%
190−200
−46.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+44.3%
70−75
−44.3%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+42.1%
95−100
−42.1%
Fortnite 180−190
+52.5%
120−130
−52.5%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+49.1%
110−120
−49.1%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+48.9%
90−95
−48.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+44.2%
95−100
−44.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+45.7%
70−75
−45.7%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+47.1%
70−75
−47.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+48.2%
110−120
−48.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+42.7%
110−120
−42.7%
Valorant 240−250
+42.4%
170−180
−42.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+47.4%
95−100
−47.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+44.3%
70−75
−44.3%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+42.1%
95−100
−42.1%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+49.1%
110−120
−49.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+45.7%
70−75
−45.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+48.2%
110−120
−48.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+42.7%
110−120
−42.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 180−190
+52.5%
120−130
−52.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+48%
75−80
−48%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−310
+42.9%
210−220
−42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+48.3%
60−65
−48.3%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+42.2%
45−50
−42.2%
Valorant 270−280
+43.7%
190−200
−43.7%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+42.7%
75−80
−42.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+50%
70−75
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+47.1%
85−90
−47.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+52.7%
55−60
−52.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+43.8%
80−85
−43.8%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
+46.2%
65−70
−46.2%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+55.6%
45−50
−55.6%
Valorant 250−260
+43.9%
180−190
−43.9%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+53.3%
45−50
−53.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+45%
40−45
−45%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+52.7%
55−60
−52.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+55%
40−45
−55%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+45%
40−45
−45%

This is how RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile and Arc Pro B50 compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 44% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 47% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 57% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.08 28.21
Recency 19 March 2025 5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 70 Watt

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile has a 42.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc Pro B50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 35.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Pro B50 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.