Radeon Pro W6600M vs RTX A5000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A5000 Mobile with Radeon Pro W6600M, including specs and performance data.

RTX A5000 Mobile
2021
16 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
39.69
+13.1%

RTX A5000 Mobile outperforms Pro W6600M by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking99136
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGA104Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61441792
Core clock speed1215 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2903 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt (80 - 150 Watt TGP)90 Watt
Texture fill rate302.4325.1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on RTX A5000 Mobile and Radeon Pro W6600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA8.6no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD108
+13.7%
95−100
−13.7%
1440p66
+20%
55−60
−20%
4K48
+20%
40−45
−20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76 no data
Battlefield 5 120−130 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 no data
Far Cry 5 85−90 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 no data
Hitman 3 80−85 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 181 no data
Metro Exodus 110−120 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 231 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 64 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 64 no data
Battlefield 5 120−130 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 no data
Far Cry 5 85−90 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 no data
Hitman 3 40 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170 no data
Metro Exodus 39 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 192 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 no data
Far Cry 5 85−90 no data
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 133 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 45 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 44 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 79 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 no data
Hitman 3 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90 no data
Metro Exodus 62 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 43 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Hitman 3 38 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 38 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 29 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 63 no data
Metro Exodus 43 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 26 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 no data

This is how RTX A5000 Mobile and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 14% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 20% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 20% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.69 35.08
Recency 12 April 2021 8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 90 Watt

The RTX A5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6600M in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A5000 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
RTX A5000 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 53 votes

Rate RTX A5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.