RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB vs Radeon Pro W6600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking219not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23GA104
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date8 June 2021 (3 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924096
Core clock speed1224 MHz495 MHz
Boost clock speed2034 MHz1170 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate227.8149.8
Floating-point processing power7.29 TFLOPS9.585 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs112128
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Cores2832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 June 2021 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 70 Watt

Pro W6600M has an age advantage of 1 month, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6600M and RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation card while RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB
RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 16 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.