Radeon Pro W6600M vs RTX A3000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	154	136
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GA104	Navi 23
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	1792
Core clock speed	1080 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	2903 MHz
Number of transistors	17,400 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)	90 Watt
Texture fill rate	237.6	325.1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on RTX A3000 Mobile and Radeon Pro W6600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.0 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.6	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
CUDA	8.6	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	96 −4.2%	100−110 +4.2%
1440p	46 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%
4K	46 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

77
+28.3%

60−65

−28.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −5%	60−65 +5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	79 +29.5%	60−65 −29.5%
Battlefield 5	100−110 −7.5%	110−120 +7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −8.3%	75−80 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	66 +10%	60−65 −10%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −4.2%	75−80 +4.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 −5.9%	90−95 +5.9%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −5.9%	100−110 +5.9%
Hitman 3	146 +67.8%	85−90 −67.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	164 +28.1%	120−130 −28.1%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −4.5%	90−95 +4.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −4.8%	85−90 +4.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	164 +40.2%	110−120 −40.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	93 +43.1%	65−70 −43.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −5%	60−65 +5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	68 +11.5%	60−65 −11.5%
Battlefield 5	100−110 −7.5%	110−120 +7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −8.3%	75−80 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	53 −13.2%	60−65 +13.2%
Far Cry 5	85 +13.3%	75−80 −13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	49 −83.7%	90−95 +83.7%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −5.9%	100−110 +5.9%
Hitman 3	39 −123%	85−90 +123%
Horizon Zero Dawn	151 +18%	120−130 −18%
Metro Exodus	98 +5.4%	90−95 −5.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −4.8%	85−90 +4.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	67 −74.6%	110−120 +74.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	151 +75.6%	85−90 −75.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	86 +32.3%	65−70 −32.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −5%	60−65 +5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	51 −19.6%	60−65 +19.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −8.3%	75−80 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	43 −39.5%	60−65 +39.5%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −4.2%	75−80 +4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −5.9%	100−110 +5.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	114 −12.3%	120−130 +12.3%
Metro Exodus	87 −6.9%	90−95 +6.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	61 −41%	85−90 +41%
Watch Dogs: Legion	39 −66.7%	65−70 +66.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85

−4.8%

85−90
+4.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −8.1%	65−70 +8.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 −8.1%	80−85 +8.1%
Hitman 3	40−45 −6.8%	45−50 +6.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −12%	27−30 +12%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −8.6%	35−40 +8.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −8.6%	35−40 +8.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −8.3%	50−55 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	27 +3.8%	24−27 −3.8%
Far Cry 5	69 +9.5%	60−65 −9.5%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −7.5%	70−75 +7.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −8.7%	75−80 +8.7%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −6.5%	65−70 +6.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	86 +3.6%	80−85 −3.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −11.6%	45−50 +11.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	41 −41.5%	55−60 +41.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −10%	40−45 +10%
Hitman 3	24−27 −7.7%	27−30 +7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −7.5%	40−45 +7.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −8%	27−30 +8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45 +9.8%	40−45 −9.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −9.5%	21−24 +9.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −7.5%	40−45 +7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −10.3%	30−35 +10.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −6.7%	45−50 +6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −7.5%	40−45 +7.5%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −9.1%	35−40 +9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−10.7%

30−35
+10.7%

This is how RTX A3000 Mobile and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

Pro W6600M is 4% faster in 1080p
RTX A3000 Mobile is 2% faster in 1440p
RTX A3000 Mobile is 2% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A3000 Mobile is 76% faster.
in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro W6600M is 123% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX A3000 Mobile is ahead in 17 tests (24%)
Pro W6600M is ahead in 55 tests (76%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	32.63	35.05
Recency	12 April 2021	8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	90 Watt